Author Topic: Husqvarna 66 (Read 2063 times)

Cut4fun . · « **Reply #20 on:** June 04, 2020, 12:36:24 pm »

Found a few more old pics of the husqvarna 66 1989 saw

Spike60 · « **Reply #21 on:** June 08, 2020, 01:16:54 pm »

I finally got one of these since the last time we talked about them. Low hours and in good shape. I'll try and get some pics up at some point.

president · « **Reply #22 on:** June 08, 2020, 01:33:41 pm »

I have a cylinder,and the intake port is much smaller than my 266se
and if its open port potential power would suffer.My 162 is the same potr
openings of the 266se

Cut4fun . · « **Reply #23 on:** June 09, 2020, 07:52:51 am »

Quote from: president on June 08, 2020, 01:33:41 pm

I have a cylinder,and the intake port is much smaller than my 266se
and if its open port potential power would suffer.My 162 is the same potr
openings of the 266se

No clue here. Never pulled the open port cylinder. Went straight to a collector overseas somewhere. Thinking it was Finland. Cant recall for sure now.

Spike60 · « **Reply #24 on:** June 19, 2020, 05:49:02 am »

Intake port really shouldn't be smaller than a 266. Actually ought to be bigger. That 66 top end is the same as used on the 268 open port and 268K cut off saws. Uses the same intake block as the 268/272. Possible that different cylinder sources could be the deal. Gilardoni maybe? My 66 is from the Tomos factory, and I've never taken mine apart either.

Chainsaw Repair

News:

Author Topic: Husqvarna 66 (Read 2063 times)

Cut4fun .

Re: Husqvarna 66

Spike60

Re: Husqvarna 66

president

Re: Husqvarna 66

Cut4fun .

Re: Husqvarna 66

Spike60

Re: Husqvarna 66

Related Topics