Chainsaw Repair

Husqvarna - Stihl - Poulan - Jonsered - Dolmar chainsaws and more => Stihl => Topic started by: Cut4fun . on August 17, 2014, 09:41:18 am

Title: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Cut4fun . on August 17, 2014, 09:41:18 am
Dex tested his woods ported 362 CM against his stock 665. 

Quote from: DexterDay
I finally got around to testing the 665 and my Mastermind 362C-M today. After seeing Chvymn99 results,  I had to see for myself.  His 665 beat a ported 562xp.  Not by much. But by a little. :)
Both saws had new Stihl RS chains.. Brand new. Stihl had an 18" Sugi bar and 7 pin rim and Solo had 20" Forester bar and 7 pin rim.
The Cant has gotten considerably harder. I have a new 10" x 10" x 10' Cant that will be done soon. :)
The results? Well? See for yourself. I will post the times I got from watching the video with the stopwatch in a bit. :dex:
Steven, open that box up buddy!! These are something special! !
Mastermind MS 362C-M and a stock Solo 665:

http://youtu.be/PwMMvM_6cqc



Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Cut4fun . on August 17, 2014, 09:42:43 am
Dex times them from video.  Also stated 2.5 tanks through the 665  and 5-6 through the 362. So none are broken in. But the 362 is woods ported. 

MS 362C-M
1- 6.8 sec
2- 6.1 sec
3- 6.2 sec

Solo 665
1- 6.2 sec
2- 5.7 sec
3- 5.5 sec
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: adam32 on August 17, 2014, 10:05:56 am
Awesome!!

The best thing about the 665 is it can be a 75cc, 79cc, 81cc or 85cc saw in a couple hours too... :)
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: mdavlee . on August 17, 2014, 10:25:15 am
Does the 665 fit into the 4 cube class?
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Cut4fun . on August 17, 2014, 10:26:52 am
Does the 665 fit into the 4 cube class?

IMO if measured it will be just a hair over legal.   I posted the cc some where. Let me look.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Cut4fun . on August 17, 2014, 10:34:56 am
Does the 665 fit into the 4 cube class?

IMO if measured it will be just a hair over legal.   I posted the cc some where. Let me look.

Finally found it.

Make sure legal with just being over the 4ci by a hair

665   =  65.955

 4ci = 65.548   You know how some shows can be.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: mdavlee . on August 17, 2014, 11:32:31 am
I thought that it was just a tiny bit over.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: farmboy on August 17, 2014, 12:16:35 pm
OH YEH!!  665was my bet! Just think how it will run with the right man grinding on it a little.
Shep
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: bloodontheice on August 17, 2014, 12:26:14 pm
That 362 needs another 5-10 tanks through it to loosen up.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Cut4fun . on August 17, 2014, 01:25:09 pm
He said he would post the test again when both are broke in. Remember the 665 has only 2.5 tanks through it.  362 has 5-6 already.

He said the CM 362 was turning 14plus and the 665 13K out of the wood.  Wonder what rpm's were showing in the cut and guessing he ran 7T on both.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Old Iron Logging on August 17, 2014, 01:39:07 pm
We are finding about 20-25 tanks to get the most out of new Stihl saws. That said, it should be the same for the Solo also. Beating a 562 was no surprise, beating a ported 362 is. I had 2 ported 361s that I could cut firewood  with all day that would smoke that 665.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: man of stihl on August 17, 2014, 02:03:07 pm
Not trying to stir anything up at all here but here is my observation.
I am not at all surprised that the 665 could be the fastest 65cc stock saw there is. But to beat a ported saw close to the same size makes me wonder......
I have ran a friends 681 and it is truly the fastest stock 5 cube saw there is IMO. It was faster than the jred 2186 I had at the time and faster than my stock dolmar 7900 I have now. But in no way is it faster than his ported 2171`s, my ported husqvarna 372 or my ported 7900.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Cut4fun . on August 17, 2014, 04:15:34 pm
Got some stock 681 gtg racing times from my gtg's and maybe others. I have a stack of them.

3 cuts in 8x8 hotstart over wood

Nate stock 681  4.72

dozerdan 375 my old saw 4.15

? 046 8.35
? 575 8.58
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Cut4fun . on August 17, 2014, 04:24:11 pm
another racing gtg

Bill stock 681 in 10x10  hot start over wood

PP375  4.72
EHP372 5.04
stock 681 5.97
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Cut4fun . on August 17, 2014, 04:27:06 pm
Thats all I can see with a stock 681 chained against ported saws chained.

There were many other folks ported saws beat by the stock 681's Just didnt list them.  ;)
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: KilliansRedLeo on August 18, 2014, 02:20:54 am
Did you ever have one of those days where everything you touched turned to chit? Perhaps it was one of those days for the builder when that saw was ported.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: mdavlee . on August 18, 2014, 07:12:02 am
Did Romeo or Andy/redprospector win the build off way back when?
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: aclarke on August 18, 2014, 09:44:24 am
Romeo (shawn), me and Dean (Washington?).  Test wood was around 25"  with 28" bars.  All three saws were within a few tenths.  Think Romeo won by a margin.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: mdavlee . on August 18, 2014, 12:28:22 pm
I thought Romeo did win. Last I heard he was full into dirt bikes for his kids
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: aclarke on August 18, 2014, 01:43:25 pm
Yep, good guy and quite a character!  He posted a vid years ago on Racesaws of him doing a root canal on one of his buddies with porting tools and a bottle whiskey!!!!!   Lol 
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Cut4fun . on August 18, 2014, 02:24:34 pm
I thought Romeo did win. Last I heard he was full into dirt bikes for his kids

Can you imagine the dirt bikes those kids get to ride.   :o
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: DexterDay on August 19, 2014, 01:25:26 pm
That 362 needs another 5-10 tanks through it to loosen up.

I will be testing it again once more fuel is ran through both of them..

This isn't a bash on the 362C-M.  It is considerably stronger than it was before it left. It's more of an amazement at the power of the bone stock 665. No muff mod and I never touched the tune. It's idling right at 3K and tops at 13k.  ;D

He said he would post the test again when both are broke in. Remember the 665 has only 2.5 tanks through it.  362 has 5-6 already.

He said the CM 362 was turning 14plus and the 665 13K out of the wood.  Wonder what rpm's were showing in the cut and guessing he ran 7T on both.

Yes. 7T rims on both. The only difference was I ran an 18" on the Stihl and a 20" on the Solo. Both were brand new out of the box Stihl RS chains. I also ran a stock 562xp and a brand new Woodland Pro chain and it was running 9's.

Did you ever have one of those days where everything you touched turned to chit? Perhaps it was one of those days for the builder when that saw was ported.

As noted above, it runs great.. Much better than stock. I just think that the Solo is a better running saw. Some stock saws just run better than others. You can probably take 10 of these Solo's and run them all side by side and there will be a difference in the times. I like to think I just got a good one  8) 8)

And thanks for the thread Kevin. I have been working and going like gang busters for the last 3 weeks.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: KilliansRedLeo on August 19, 2014, 01:27:35 pm
Dexter, has Dewey run his yet?
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Cut4fun . on August 19, 2014, 02:44:31 pm
No problem Dex.  I'm just scared my little poulan wont handle the stroked 665 either. Even though I know the poulan would own a stock 562. Ported man oh man I just dont know.

Time will tell.

solo 665 has  47mm bore   x 38mm stroke

dolmar makita  47mm bore x 37mm stroke

husky 365 48mm bore x 36mm stroke

poulan 48mm bore  x 36mm stroke

husky 562 46mm bore x 36mm stroke  ? check me on these

stihl 362  47mm bore x 34mm stroke ?  check me on these
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: DexterDay on August 19, 2014, 02:57:40 pm
Dexter, has Dewey run his yet?

I think he has, but just a simple cut or two.  Member KG461 on our site has ran his quite extensively. And Randy said his was a modest port (was his first). Mine and Dewey's were done at the same time, so I would venture to believe they should be very close.

I almost want to put an 8 pin on the 362 and do it again? I think that the 8 pin and the extra RPM it has, will cut quicker, by not leaning on it as much and letting the shear chain speed win. I was pushing on them a fair amount. Trying to judge torque as well. The 665 would get a 8 pin as well.  Just so it was fair on all levels.

Also, next round will all be done with a 18" or 20" and the same chain. It was easier and faster to run different bars and chains that day. Labor day weekend will be my next day off (33 days straight).
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: mdavlee . on August 19, 2014, 03:44:49 pm
That 362 needs another 5-10 tanks through it to loosen up.

I will be testing it again once more fuel is ran through both of them..

This isn't a bash on the 362C-M.  It is considerably stronger than it was before it left. It's more of an amazement at the power of the bone stock 665. No muff mod and I never touched the tune. It's idling right at 3K and tops at 13k.  ;D

He said he would post the test again when both are broke in. Remember the 665 has only 2.5 tanks through it.  362 has 5-6 already.

He said the CM 362 was turning 14plus and the 665 13K out of the wood.  Wonder what rpm's were showing in the cut and guessing he ran 7T on both.

Yes. 7T rims on both. The only difference was I ran an 18" on the Stihl and a 20" on the Solo. Both were brand new out of the box Stihl RS chains. I also ran a stock 562xp and a brand new Woodland Pro chain and it was running 9's.

Did you ever have one of those days where everything you touched turned to chit? Perhaps it was one of those days for the builder when that saw was ported.

As noted above, it runs great.. Much better than stock. I just think that the Solo is a better running saw. Some stock saws just run better than others. You can probably take 10 of these Solo's and run them all side by side and there will be a difference in the times. I like to think I just got a good one  8) 8)

And thanks for the thread Kevin. I have been working and going like gang busters for the last 3 weeks.

But what if that 665 is the slow one of 10? :)
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: DexterDay on August 19, 2014, 03:51:19 pm
...But what if that 665 is the slow one of 10? :)

Quite possible. .
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: adam32 on August 19, 2014, 04:59:45 pm
I'm going to try and video my ported 662, stock 665 and race ported 266 this week to compare. 20" wood.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: mdavlee . on August 19, 2014, 05:43:00 pm
...But what if that 665 is the slow one of 10? :)

Quite possible. .

You never know

That would be good Adam.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Cut4fun on August 25, 2014, 08:39:53 pm
Round 2 by Dex.  $700+ 362CM plus 250/275 porting close to 1K against a stock $500 solo 655.

Dex = Came out about the same.. I ran more cuts with the Solo. Testing a harder "lean" on the saw and a lighter "lean". Round 2 of Solo 665 and Stihl MS 362C-M:

http://youtu.be/QF4YmkPl4ow




Dex timing

Stihl MS 362C-M
6.6
6.1
5.9


Solo
5.8
5.4
5.8
5.6
5.3
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: Cut4fun on August 25, 2014, 08:41:05 pm
I am just amazed that a stock solo with just 6cc more is kicking on a woods ported 59cc.   :P
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: DexterDay on August 25, 2014, 09:34:21 pm
I am just amazed that a stock solo with just 6cc more is kicking on a woods ported 59cc.   :P


Between the fastest of the 362 and the slowest of the 665 is only 1/10th of a second. Granted the average difference is probably a 1/2 second. But that time to the average eye? You wouldn't catch it. And the 362 feels faster than the 655.

I think both are equally strong and both have Pro's and Cons.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: farmboy on August 25, 2014, 10:11:27 pm
I'm still amazed over it whipping the WP 562. 
Shep
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: mdavlee . on August 26, 2014, 06:49:40 am
They're strong saws. I could see it pulling a 24" bar in that sized wood.
Title: Re: Stihl 362 C-M ported v/s Solo 665 stock
Post by: fastleo151 on September 15, 2014, 10:20:57 pm
This is interesting stuff.  How's a 262 fit in the mix.