Author Topic: 6400 Dolmar  (Read 2831 times)

0 Members and 22 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline aclarke

  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 1676
  • Karma: 172

  • Total Badges: 25
    Badges: (View All)
    Fourth year Anniversary Third year Anniversary 1000 Posts Second year Anniversary Level 5 500 Posts
Re: 6400 Dolmar
« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2014, 11:28:55 pm »
Perhaps, although the blowdown is likely the real issue. I put the New crank and bearings in the case and buttoned it up tonight so I'll be able to see what the original and altered timing number are.

I find it interesting that dolmar went to the slab piston in the 7900. Not that I don't think it works well but, however, the original piston was designed with asymmetric windows in the piston which were done for a reason and took a lot of thought and engineering. I'm very curious why they dropped that piston for the slab side?? Can the slab side be lighter? Hard to believe, but perhaps they opted for a lighter piston when the crank issues came up?

On a side note, the New crank I pressed into the bearings/crank halves had a lot more interference fit than any previous 7900 I've worked on. Almost Stihl tight!!! Lol

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
13 Replies
2001 Views
Last post January 02, 2012, 07:14:22 pm
by rms61moparman
1 Replies
1509 Views
Last post March 10, 2012, 07:00:24 am
by MCW
6 Replies
1775 Views
Last post June 30, 2017, 05:39:15 pm
by Philbert
7 Replies
611 Views
Last post February 05, 2014, 09:06:04 pm
by KilliansRedLeo
5 Replies
710 Views
Last post February 26, 2014, 08:33:13 pm
by Ducksnuff870
21 Replies
1198 Views
Last post July 08, 2014, 03:01:08 pm
by Nathaniel Vansickle
0 Replies
326 Views
Last post July 03, 2014, 12:13:53 pm
by Cut4fun .
23 Replies
1568 Views
Last post September 02, 2015, 09:40:26 pm
by Nathaniel Vansickle
35 Replies
1456 Views
Last post January 27, 2016, 03:28:50 pm
by Cut4fun .
0 Replies
1015 Views
Last post May 25, 2018, 09:23:42 am
by Cut4fun .