Author Topic: Poulan 46cc Porting Plane conversion  (Read 3700 times)

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline 660magnum

  • Global Moderator
  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 6437
  • Karma: 249
  • For The Love Of Chainsaws
  • Location: NCO

  • Total Badges: 39
    Badges: (View All)
    Seventh year Anniversary Sixth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary Fourth year Anniversary 5000 Posts Third year Anniversary
Re: Poulan 46cc Porting Plane conversion
« on: August 02, 2014, 01:50:38 pm »
Goose
Hi all. I am currently converting a 46cc Poulan into an rc airplane engine. I am pretty new to engine work, so be advised some beginner questions are coming atchya.

This engine seems to have quite a bit of potential with some real simple mods. SO i would like to do some real introductory porting (i.e. staying away from messing with the timing too much) In the picture of the exhaust port you can see a metal insert. What is this for and can I remove it to do some smoothing? You can see the exit hole where that insert sits is pretty large but the actual exhaust port entering the jug is much smaller. Can I simply open that up to match the larger opening ON THE SIDES and stay away from top and bottom?

Keep in mind, and (this is for chainsaw guys reading this post), model airplane engines are usually set up for maximum power no greater than 8000 rpm for prop tip speed considerations. When messing with the exhaust port, the shape where it enters the cylinder is very important to prevent the ring from snagging the top of the port. If it were me, I would definitely remove the steel insert and, as you said, enlarging at least the width of the exhaust port. It does no good to lower the bottom of the port because it is normally level with the piston at bottom dead center anyway. If you raise the top of the port, you risk raising the rpm at which maximum power is produced. Also the outside of the port where the muffler is attached is rather limited by the bolt holes.

Is there concern in general with porting of flaking off the chrome when filing/grinding the very edge of the port/cylinder?

If using a rat tail file, I would approach the hard coating from the inside out to prevent flaking of the Nikasil coating.

Is that little brass nub on the intake side the equivalent to the impulse line, running the diaphragm pump? It hooks up directly into the carb. Is there a difference between this (or an impulse line) and a 'breather'?

Yes, it is the impulse hose connection for the pump diaphragm in the carburetor. It is not a breather to the outside atmosphere like is on a 4 cycle engine.

Last question: While it is common to completely replace the muffler for rc conversions, if I were to mod this one, would opening up those two smaller holes on each side of the larger one where the screen imprint has been left be a pretty typical mod? I hear people talk a lot about punching out holes or enlarging holes in the muffler... I assume they are talking about right where the exhaust finally exists (i.e. the holes the spark arresting screen covers)?

I would completely file out the depressed area that was behind the screen to make it a big rectangle opening including the area where the two holes are/were. Also, the screen cover should be opened up to allow free flow. The screen is normally left out on model engines. The side of the muffler that connects to the engine exhaust port cannot be opened significantly because you are limited by the bolt holes on each side of the port. but match the exhaust outlet, exhaust gasket, and the muffler where it attaches to the engine.

Thanks for any help. I realize its a lot of questions. I have been reading up about mods, but want to be sure my understanding is up to par thus far. I am doing this in part to to gain confidence in working on chainsaw engines for when I need/want to work on my more expensive cutting saws.

This engine is a clamshell design so you cannot normally decrease the squish.  But you could look around for a piston with a higher deck? The edges of the piston would need to be lowered to stock height but this would leave you with a pop-up piston that could reduce squish to the typical .020" plus maybe a little height into the combustion area in the center?


We should share what we know... someone may learn...
That knowledge can live after us... and that "Pays It Forward".
Be all that you can be . . .

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
6 Replies
1827 Views
Last post June 01, 2016, 09:03:45 pm
by RobbinW
Poulan 295 Porting

Started by Dh1984 « 1 2 » Poulan

11 Replies
2632 Views
Last post May 20, 2011, 08:55:11 am
by Dh1984
5 Replies
937 Views
Last post December 31, 2012, 12:55:16 pm
by Chris J.
6 Replies
1139 Views
Last post September 13, 2013, 12:49:19 pm
by 3000 FPS
4 Replies
660 Views
Last post April 28, 2013, 12:30:19 pm
by 660magnum
13 Replies
1103 Views
Last post March 26, 2017, 03:06:09 pm
by Revpop
15 Replies
1526 Views
Last post September 09, 2015, 10:06:43 pm
by Eccentric
4 Replies
876 Views
Last post October 14, 2016, 12:25:30 pm
by Cut4fun .
26 Replies
2017 Views
Last post March 03, 2020, 03:07:26 pm
by Cut4fun .
2 Replies
331 Views
Last post September 18, 2021, 08:00:25 am
by Cut4fun