Author Topic: Woods ported 066 (Read 1167 times)

srcarr52 · « **Reply #10 on:** December 20, 2015, 06:38:11 pm »

Quote from: Cut4fun on December 20, 2015, 08:44:25 am

I still cant imagine putting liquid steel stuff in my intake in a WORK saw. No way for me.

Cant cutter yes, work saw no.

Only necessary on the new 660 cylinders so you can do what you could to an 066 cylinder without any issue.

Cut4fun · « **Reply #11 on:** December 20, 2015, 06:43:03 pm »

Quote from: srcarr52 on December 20, 2015, 06:38:11 pm

Quote from: Cut4fun on December 20, 2015, 08:44:25 am
I still cant imagine putting liquid steel stuff in my intake in a WORK saw. No way for me.

Cant cutter yes, work saw no.

Only necessary on the new 660 cylinders so you can do what you could to an 066 cylinder without any issue.

My 2 ported ones was the older no decomp cylinders. 1 ran so good a so called builder in Ohio was wanting it for its numbers. Has them in his little black cheat sheet book now too and calls it his own.

Al Smith · « **Reply #12 on:** December 20, 2015, 09:28:00 pm »

Most of us by now know that the so called numbers mean very little without things like shape, port time area open relative to speed etc .

You know they high port the things and they go like crazy in a piece of damp cottonwood .Stick it in a piece of oak and it falls on it's face .What did that prove ?

Cut4fun . · « **Reply #13 on:** December 20, 2015, 10:12:31 pm »

I would imagine port mapping was done Al. I gave them the saw for a week or so to get info from. OK'ed by guy that ported it.

Chainsaw Repair

News:

Author Topic: Woods ported 066 (Read 1167 times)

srcarr52

Re: Woods ported 066

Cut4fun

Re: Woods ported 066

Al Smith

Re: Woods ported 066

Cut4fun .

Re: Woods ported 066

Related Topics