Chainsaw Repair

What PS is it you haven't tested yet? 63PS?

I havent tested 63PS

I have only tested 63PS3 back in 2011.  All right there in the OP 2011 and videos just posted from 2011.

Jim when I had my PS3 here. The local  stihl dealers had no clue on it.

Weird the website wouldnt have the PS up yet.  I have both PS3 and PS if you want a look see.

I am confused do you have 63PS or not? If you don't it can be arranged..

It will not perform better than LPX if both is out of the box.

I have both PS3 and PS if you want a look see.

    How many times do I have to say I have PS and PS3   ?   



 LPX I wouldnt have thought PS or PS3 would be faster.  But cool for confirming my thoughts.

Quote from: HolmenTree on August 21, 2013, 11:37:40 pm

I haven't tested the Stihl PS3 yet.

You should have the newest out PS non-safety. I never tested the PS yet either. Only the older PS3 I got in 2011.

Yes typo mistake on my part, I have the 63PS without the extra safety links not the 63PS3. Honest mistake since I'm 1500 miles from home.
I'm not concerned about the Oregon 91 VXL chain to compare it too, I'm going to test it for cutting speed against my 95 VPX .325  that I'm running on my 338XPT.
The Oregon 95VPX semi chisel narrow kerf has excellent chip clearance and flow rating for a small chain ,but the chisel 63PS extended pitch 3/8" with the chisel working corner should put out quicker cutting speeds on the little Husky top handle.
Only a stop watch timing the difference in cutting speeds can make this test worthy. I always test my sawchains in clean knotless spruce 10"x10" cants. If there is a difference in .5 to 1 sec or slightly more in cuts between the 2 chains, that is major difference when the saw in a work day will make hundreds if not thousands of cuts. Add those cuts up and there is a major difference.
Only difference that may be negative against the 63PS chisel is cutting edge sharpness holding capability compared to the semi chisel 91VXL. But seeing the intended market for the 63Ps is directed for use with the MS201T which is a aerial saw used in clean cutting conditions , dulling shouldn't be an issue.

Quote from: Cut4fun_ on August 22, 2013, 12:38:25 pm

Quote from: HolmenTree on August 21, 2013, 11:37:40 pm

I haven't tested the Stihl PS3 yet.

You should have the newest out PS non-safety. I never tested the PS yet either. Only the older PS3 I got in 2011.

Yes typo mistake on my part, I have the 63PS without the extra safety links not the 63PS3. Honest mistake since I'm 1500 miles from home.
I'm not concerned about the Oregon 91 VXL chain to compare it too, I'm going to test it for cutting speed against my 95 VPX .325  that I'm running on my 338XPT.
The Oregon 95VPX semi chisel narrow kerf has excellent chip clearance and flow rating for a small chain ,but the chisel 63PS extended pitch 3/8" with the chisel working corner should put out quicker cutting speeds on the little Husky top handle.
Only a stop watch timing the difference in cutting speeds can make this test worthy. I always test my sawchains in clean knotless spruce 10"x10" cants. If there is a difference in .5 to 1 sec or slightly more in cuts between the 2 chains, that is major difference when the saw in a work day will make hundreds if not thousands of cuts. Add those cuts up and there is a major difference.
Only difference that may be negative against the 63PS chisel is cutting edge sharpness holding capability compared to the semi chisel 91VXL. But seeing the intended market for the 63Ps is directed for use with the MS201T which is a aerial saw used in clean cutting conditions , dulling shouldn't be an issue.

I'm glad to see you understand how to test chains out the right way. Being a racer yourself that only makes since.