Author Topic: Jonsered 2083  (Read 17331 times)

0 Members and 27 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline 660magnum

  • Global Moderator
  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 6437
  • Karma: 249
  • For The Love Of Chainsaws
  • Location: NCO

  • Total Badges: 39
    Badges: (View All)
    Seventh year Anniversary Sixth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary Fourth year Anniversary 5000 Posts Third year Anniversary
Re: Jonsered 2083
« Reply #50 on: March 17, 2013, 01:24:06 pm »
Pay Pal likes to wait a week before giving any credits
We should share what we know... someone may learn...
That knowledge can live after us... and that "Pays It Forward".
Be all that you can be . . .

Offline SawTroll

  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 1196
  • Karma: 71
  • Information collector
  • Location: Troms, North Norway

  • Total Badges: 28
    Badges: (View All)
    Sixth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary Fourth year Anniversary 1000 Posts Third year Anniversary Spammer 25 Posts in one day
Re: Jonsered 2083
« Reply #51 on: March 18, 2013, 10:08:05 am »
066 Meteor piston is .020 higher then 2083 OEM piston. Squish with gasket, OEM piston was .041. With 066 piston squish is at .021. Comp is at 170 pounds. The 2083 rod is wider than the 066, piston needs to be opened up. Runs good ;). ..... 

That fits well with what I have read before!  ;D

Offline Cut4fun

  • Administrator
  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 4666
  • Karma: 216
  • OHIO REDNECK

  • Total Badges: 44
    Badges: (View All)
    Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Eighth year Anniversary Level 7 Seventh year Anniversary Apple User
Re: Jonsered 2083
« Reply #52 on: April 11, 2013, 06:06:46 pm »
066 Meteor piston is .020 higher then 2083 OEM piston. Squish with gasket, OEM piston was .041. With 066 piston squish is at .021. Comp is at 170 pounds. The 2083 rod is wider than the 066, piston needs to be opened up. Runs good ;).

Ron I paid closer attention to my measurements this time and measured the squish closer to where the piston and cylinder  intersect.   I came up with .0245 at tightest on the afm 066 piston with used gasket.

The oem 505 one on the other saw when I installed today was .040 with new oem gasket.  I checked the 425 top before puling it and it was .0435 with used gasket.

Offline man of stihl

  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 1219
  • Karma: 71
  • NW PA
  • Location: nw pennsylvania

  • Total Badges: 31
    Badges: (View All)
    Level 6 Fourth year Anniversary Spammer 25 Posts in one day Karma Good 1000 Posts Third year Anniversary
Re: Jonsered 2083
« Reply #53 on: April 11, 2013, 08:13:41 pm »
Have you run the 505 yet? That's quite a bump in compression too compared to stock.
Ron

Offline Cut4fun .

  • Administrator
  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 23708
  • Karma: 664
  • OHIO REDNECK Saw Repair Getter Done
    • Redneck Chainsaw Repair

  • Total Badges: 53
    Badges: (View All)
    Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Level 8 Apple User Eighth year Anniversary 20000 Posts
Re: Jonsered 2083
« Reply #54 on: April 11, 2013, 08:30:06 pm »
not in wood. rained all day. 

Did you check psi on yours?  LOL I see it now 170psi?

New caber 1 ring on oem, so both will be like new saws to test with. Green one has 2 rings that came with the afm piston. 

yellow v/s green one.   I could feel the difference pulling over too.

Will have the strongest 7900 local along  for comparisons.

Offline SawTroll

  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 1196
  • Karma: 71
  • Information collector
  • Location: Troms, North Norway

  • Total Badges: 28
    Badges: (View All)
    Sixth year Anniversary Fifth year Anniversary Fourth year Anniversary 1000 Posts Third year Anniversary Spammer 25 Posts in one day
Re: Jonsered 2083
« Reply #55 on: April 12, 2013, 06:05:22 am »
The Partner P7700 and the Jonsered 2083 (not 2083II) are the really important models in that saw family!  ;D

Offline man of stihl

  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 1219
  • Karma: 71
  • NW PA
  • Location: nw pennsylvania

  • Total Badges: 31
    Badges: (View All)
    Level 6 Fourth year Anniversary Spammer 25 Posts in one day Karma Good 1000 Posts Third year Anniversary
Re: Jonsered 2083
« Reply #56 on: April 12, 2013, 05:32:27 pm »
Not timed. But seat of my pants says the stock 7900 was stronger than the 2083. But I've been wrong before... ;)
Ron

Offline Cut4fun .

  • Administrator
  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 23708
  • Karma: 664
  • OHIO REDNECK Saw Repair Getter Done
    • Redneck Chainsaw Repair

  • Total Badges: 53
    Badges: (View All)
    Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Level 8 Apple User Eighth year Anniversary 20000 Posts
Re: Jonsered 2083
« Reply #57 on: April 12, 2013, 07:32:23 pm »
I would think the quad transfers of the 7900 would be over the single transfers of the old school design 475 and 505.

Offline Cut4fun .

  • Administrator
  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 23708
  • Karma: 664
  • OHIO REDNECK Saw Repair Getter Done
    • Redneck Chainsaw Repair

  • Total Badges: 53
    Badges: (View All)
    Tenth year Anniversary Nineth year Anniversary Level 8 Apple User Eighth year Anniversary 20000 Posts
Re: Jonsered 2083
« Reply #58 on: April 13, 2013, 11:53:21 am »
Ron see if your thinking is like mine on this.

After clearing my mind last night and thinking about this from a racesaw build perspective. I would choose the 475 505 to build as a racesaw before the 7900 though.

Watcha you think.

Offline man of stihl

  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 1219
  • Karma: 71
  • NW PA
  • Location: nw pennsylvania

  • Total Badges: 31
    Badges: (View All)
    Level 6 Fourth year Anniversary Spammer 25 Posts in one day Karma Good 1000 Posts Third year Anniversary
Re: Jonsered 2083
« Reply #59 on: April 13, 2013, 02:15:37 pm »
Idk. There are a lot of the quad port saws ruling the roost nowadays. But I 'm no builder. ;)
Ron

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
5 Replies
818 Views
Last post August 24, 2014, 10:40:36 am
by Cut4fun
38 Replies
3377 Views
Last post June 21, 2016, 01:32:54 pm
by Cut4fun .
4 Replies
962 Views
Last post October 19, 2018, 03:18:46 pm
by Cut4fun .
1 Replies
911 Views
Last post January 14, 2017, 02:17:56 pm
by Cut4fun .
1 Replies
524 Views
Last post May 24, 2018, 09:28:10 pm
by Cut4fun .
6 Replies
686 Views
Last post July 22, 2017, 12:54:36 pm
by 3000 FPS
22 Replies
2133 Views
Last post February 26, 2024, 06:51:11 am
by Cut4fun
15 Replies
1437 Views
Last post November 16, 2018, 02:56:14 pm
by Cut4fun .
3 Replies
536 Views
Last post October 23, 2018, 11:16:06 am
by Cut4fun .
13 Replies
1122 Views
Last post February 26, 2024, 10:49:43 am
by Cut4fun .