Author Topic: crankcase vol. (no drilling involved)  (Read 2249 times)

0 Members and 68 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline aclarke

  • Nitro Hotsaw
  • *******
  • Posts: 1676
  • Karma: 172

  • Total Badges: 25
    Badges: (View All)
    Fourth year Anniversary Third year Anniversary 1000 Posts Second year Anniversary Level 5 500 Posts
Re: crankcase vol. (no drilling involved)
« on: June 05, 2015, 09:49:08 am »
So the 1.85 ratio represents a smaller case volume vs the bike motors? (1.4 ratio)   

I'm assuming the  bigger ratio  would equate to higher crankcase pressure and result in moving more fuel/air per time unit than the larger case bike motors. 

I'm wondering how this plays into the bike T/A graphs and if they are co pletely skewed towards the bike motors with their different crankcase volume/ratio?

 End result COULD be equal if you have a small motor moving air faster for less duration vs. The large motor moving air a bit slower for LONGER duration but I'm not sure the Blair Jennings data works this way or there are losses from moving the fuel air at higher pressures. (Perhaps more short circuiting)

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
12 Replies
1909 Views
Last post May 08, 2011, 06:11:27 am
by Spike60
365 crankcase

Started by chainsman1 « 1 2 » Wanted

18 Replies
1262 Views
Last post October 03, 2011, 09:31:46 pm
by chainsman1
4 Replies
848 Views
Last post July 01, 2013, 11:42:19 am
by SawTroll
Crankcase

Started by jmester Wanted

4 Replies
286 Views
Last post February 19, 2014, 06:23:01 am
by jmester
3 Replies
226 Views
Last post May 18, 2015, 12:35:03 am
by Stihlboy
066 crankcase

Started by jmester « 1 2 » Stihl

12 Replies
725 Views
Last post August 08, 2015, 10:05:48 pm
by jmester
0 Replies
185 Views
Last post September 28, 2019, 08:34:21 pm
by Ron
4 Replies
313 Views
Last post January 06, 2020, 12:34:29 pm
by 3000 FPS
0 Replies
219 Views
Last post February 05, 2020, 04:19:38 pm
by Cut4fun .
0 Replies
123 Views
Last post April 12, 2023, 11:21:40 am
by Cut4fun .